Evaluation of Rutting Potential of Polymer Modified Asphalt Binder Using Multiple Stress Creep and Recovery Method

Ahad Ali, Zia ur Rehman, Umer Farooq, Muhammad Waseem Mirza

Abstract


Asphalt is a viscoelastic material as its properties depend on the temperature, loading and aging conditions. High temperature causes flexibility in asphalt concrete as a result the mix is more susceptible to the rutting and the low temperature causes the stiff asphalt and the thermal cracking problem is more significant in this case. This research is aimed at evaluating the rutting susceptibility of neat and polymer modified asphalt by Performance Grading Plus test Multiple Stress Creep and Recovery test (MSCR). MSCR is effective for neat and polymer modified asphalts and also it is blind to the modification type. In this research asphalt neat samples of KRL (40-50, 60-70, 80-100) and ARL (60-70, 80-100) were used. ARL (60-70) was modified with Elvaloy® RET (Reactive Elastomeric Terpolymer) and KRL (60-70) was modified with Elvaloy® AC (Acrylate Terpolymer). Polymer percentages used for ARL (60-70) were 0% (neat), 1.35%, 1.70% and 2.0% whereas for KRL (60-70) was 0% (neat), 2.50%, 3.50% and 4.5%. Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR) was used to carry out MSCR test at stress levels of 100Pa and 3200Pa and at temperatures of 580C, 640C, 700C and 760C. Performance of asphalt was evaluated by analyzing the non-recoverable creep compliance (Jnr), Peak strain and Percent recovery. Modified temperature grade of asphalt were determined by comparing the actual Jnr value to the Jnr=9.46 as it corresponds to the G*/Sin δ =1000Pa. Results showed that neat sample of KRL compared to neat samples of ARL were found good to prevent rutting as they showed less peak strain, more percent recovery and less Jnr value. Polymer modification improved the properties of asphalt as it showed decreasing trend of peak strain, increasing trend of the percent recovery and also decreasing trend of Jnr values. Further high temperature grade bumping happened for polymer modified asphalts.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Mirza M. W.,Abbas Z., Rizvi M. A., 2011. Temperature Zoning of Pakistan for Asphalt Mix Design. Pakistan Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. vol. 8. pp. 49-60.

Xu, Q.W.; Solaimanian, M. Modeling temperature distribution and thermal property of asphalt concrete forlaboratory testing applications. Construction Buildinng Materials. 2010, Vol. 24, pp. 487–497.

Hunter, R.N.; Self, A.; Read, J. The Shell Bitumen Handbook, 6th ed.; ICE Publishing: London, UK, 2015

Mrawira, D.M.; Luca, J. Thermal properties and transient

temperature response of full-depth asphaltpavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002, 1809, pp. 160–171.

Chaudry R., Memon A.B. 2013. Effect of Variation in Truck Factor on Pavement Performance in Pakistan. Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. vol. 32(1). pp. 19-30.

Muhammad L.N.,Zhong W., Sandeep O.,Sam C., Abide C.D. 2006. Permanent Deformation Analysis of Hot-Mix Ashpalt Mixtures Using Simple Performance Tests and 2002 Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Software, Transportation Research Board 1970, pp. 133-142.

D’Angelo J.A., 2015.The relationship of the MSCR test to rutting. Construction and Building Materials. vol. 92. pp. 632-640.

D'Angelo J.A.,Dongre R.(2002). “Superpave binder specifications and their performance relationship to modified binders”. Proceedings of Canadian Technical Asphalt Association held at Saskatoon Canada, pp. 91-103.

AASHTO MP-19, Standard Specification For Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder Using Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) Test, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2010.

AASHTO TP 70, Standard Method of Test for Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) Test of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2013.

Becker Y., Me´ndez M.P., Rodrı´guez Y., (2001) “Polymermodified asphalt”, Vision Technologica, Vol. 9(1), pp.39–50

Polacco G., Stastna J., Biondi D., Antonelli F., Vlachovicova Z.,Zanzotto L., (2004) “Rheology of asphalts modified with glycidylmethacrylate functionalized polymers”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 280(2), pp. 366–373

Polacco G., Stastna J., Biondi D., Zanzotto L., (2006), “Relation between polymer architecture and nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of modified asphalts”, Current Opinionin Colloid &InterfaceSciences, Vol. 11(4), pp. 230–245

Domingos M.D.I., Faxina A.L., 2015. “Rheological analysis of asphalt binders modified with Elvaloy® terpolymer and polyphosphoric acidon the multiple stress creep and recovery test”. Materials and Structures, Vol. 48, Issue 5, pp. 1405-1416.






Copyright (c) 2018 Pakistan Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences

Powered By KICS