Non Linear Progressive Collapse Analysis of RC Frame Structure

A. U. Qazi, A. Hameed, M. Ilyas, A. Majid

Abstract


The casualties due to collapse of buildings are enormous either through blast or vehicle strike which could have been reduced if the buildings have resisted progressive collapse after the accidental removal of vital load bearing elements. In this research, progressive collapse (PC) potential of an existing reinforced concrete (RC) building has been evaluated analytically using Nonlinear FEM software following General Services Administration guidelines. Linear static, non-linear static, linear dynamic and non-linear dynamic analyses have been carried out to explore PC potential. Building under consideration was designed for Earthquake Zone-2B and has potential for PC in linear static analysis while non-linear static and non-linear dynamic analysis results have shown that there is no potential for PC. Results of analysis have been compared by taking deflection under joint where the column is removed and is used as base for comparison. Results show that linear static procedure is conservative as compared to non-linear analysis. Non-linear static and non-linear dynamic analysis provides almost similar results. There is negligible effect of material strength and damping variations on PC. In linear static analysis decrease in deflection of joint at column removal location is approximately 7% for every 7MPa (1000psi) increase in fc’ while 9% reduction is observed in nonlinear dynamic analysis. Damping that can be achieved through installation of dampers has been found beneficial up to 10% value. Increase in damping ratio beyond 10% of critical damping has negligible effect on deflection and PC.

Full Text:

PDF

References


ACSE, (2005) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, American Society of Civil Engineers ASCE7/SEI-05.

Maria L. Beconcini, Stefano B., Walter S., (2001) Structural characterization of a medieval bell tower: first historical, experimental and numerical investigations, University of Pisa, Department of Structural Engineering, Pisa, Italy.

http://www.wikipedia.com viewed on 15th Dec, 2011.

GSA, (2003). Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects, The US General Services Administration.

DOD; DOD ammunition and explosive safety standards, The US Department of Defense (1999).

UFC; (2008). Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions, The Unified Facilities Criteria-Department of Defense USA.

NIST; (2007). Best practices for reducing the potential for progressive collapse in buildings, National Institute of Standards and TechnologyUSA.

Starossek U., (2007). Typology of progressive collapse, Journal of Engineering Structures; 29: 2302-07.

Ronald H, William B, Jonathan B, Christopher M, James M, and Harold B N, (2002) World trade center building performance study, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)-403, USA.

Matthew Giles; (2011) Total Progressive Collapse: why, precisely, the towers fell, New York Magazine.

Meng-Hao T and Bing H., and Lin; (2008) Investigation of progressive collapse resistance and inelastic response for an earthquakeresistant RC building subjected to column failure, Journal of Engineering Structures; 30:3619-28.

Feng Fu; (2010) 3-D nonlinear dynamic progressive collapse analysis of multi-storey steel composite frame buildings — Parametric study, Journal of Engineering Structures; 32:3974-80.

Feng F., (2009) Progressive collapse analysis of high-rise building with 3-D finite element modeling method, Journal of Engineering Structures; 65:1269-78.

Elizabeth A. and Shalva M.; (2006) Dynamic analysis procedure for progressive collapse, Structure Magazine.

Lu D. G., Cui S. S., Song P. Y., Chen Z. H.; (2010) Robustness assessment for progressive collapse of framed structures using pushdown analysis method, Research Publishing Services; doi: 10.3850/978-981-08-5118-7-063.

Taewan K., Jinkoo K., and Junhee P., (2009). Investigation of progressive collapse-resisting capability of steel moment frames using pushdown analysis, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities; Vol. 23, No. 5.

Steven M. B. and Francis K. H., (2003). Preventing progressive collapse in concrete buildings, Journal of Concrete International.

Mehmet I, and Hayri B O, (2006). Effects of plastic hinge properties in nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete buildings, Journal of Engineering Structures; 28:1494-1502.

Jinkoo Kim and Taewan Kim; (2008) Assessment of progressive collapse-resisting capacity of steel moment frames, Journal of Engineering Structures; 65:169-79.

Lupoae M., Baciu C., Constantin D., Puscau H.; (2011). Aspects concerning progressive collapse of a reinforced concrete structure with infill walls, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2011Vol III, London U.K.

Majid A.; (2013). Non-linear dynamic progressive collapse analysis of RC frame structure, M.Sc. Thesis, CED, UET, Lahore.

ASTM; (2004). Standard Specifications for deformed and plain billet-steel bars for concrete reinforcement, American Association State Highway and Transportation Officials (ASTM); A 615/A 615M – 00.






Copyright (c) 2016 A. U. Qazi

Powered By KICS