Correlations of Pressuremeter Data with SPT, CPT and Laboratory Tests Data

Z. Rehman, A. Akbar, A. H. Khan, B. G. Clarke

Abstract


A simple and cost effective version of pressuremeter (PMT) has been developed in Pakistan at the University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore. This PMT called ‘Akbar Pressuremeter (APMT)’ has been used as prebored as well as full displacement pressuremeter. In-situ testing using APMT, Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and Cone Penetrometer (CPT) was carried out at three different sites. The sites comprised very soft to medium stiff clays,stiff to very stiff clays and loose to medium dense sands. Un-disturbed sampling using Shelby tubes was also carried out to determine soil strength parameters in the laboratory. An attempt has been made to develop mathematical correlations of PMT data with SPT, CPT and laboratory tests data. Plausibility analysis of the mathematical correlations has also been carried out.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Withers, N.J., Schaap, L.H.J. and Dalton, C.P. (1986), “The Development of a Full Displacement Pressuremeter,” The Pressuremeter and its Marine Applications: Second International Symposium. ASTM STP 950, pp 38-56.

Houlsby, G.T. and Withers, N.J. (1988), “Analysis of the Cone Pressuremeter Test in Clay,” Geotechnique 38, No. 4, pp 575-587.

Yu, H.S. Schnaid, F. and Collins, I.F. (1996), “Analysis of Cone Pressuremeter Tests in Sands,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 122, No.8, pp 623-632.

Rehman, Z. (2010), “Development of Pressuremeter to Operate in Alluvial Soils of Punjab,” Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.

Tschebotarioff, G.P. (1973), “Foundations, Retaining, and Earth Structures, 2nd edition”, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Briaud, J.L. (1992), “The Pressuremeter,” Balkeema, Rotterdam.

Bowles, J.E. (1996), “Foundation Analysis and Design,” 5th ed. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York.

Akbar, A. (2001), “Development of Low Cost In-situ Testing Devices,” Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

Rehman, Z, Akbar, A. and Clarke, B. G. (2011), “Characterization of a Cohesive Soil Bed using Cone Pressuremeter”, Journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society- Soils and Foundations, Vol. 51, No. 5, Oct. 2011, pp. 823-833.

Akbar, A., Rehman, Z., Clarke, B. G. and Allen, P.G., (2010), “Development and applications of Akbar Pressuremeter, International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering, Pakistan Geotechnical Engineering Society, 5-6 November, 2010, Lahore-Pakistan, pp 87-93.

Marsland, A. and Randolph, M.F. (1977), “Comparisons of Results from Pressuremeter Tests and Large In-situ Plate Tests in London Clay,” Geotechnique 27, No. 2, pp.217-243.

Houlsby, G.T. and Nutt, N.R.F. (1993), “Development of the Cone Pressuremeter,” Predictive Soil Mechanics, Proc. Wroth Memorial Symp., Oxford, pp. 254-271.

Yagiz, S., Akyol, E. and Sen, G. (2008), “Relationship between the standard penetration test and the pressuremeter test on sandy silty clays: a case study from Denizli,” Bull Eng Geol Environ (2008) 67: pp 405–410.

Terzaghi, K. and Peck, R.B., (1967), “Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice”, John Wiley, New York, pp 729.

Parcher, J.V. and Means, R.E. (1968), “Soil Mechanics and Foundations”, Charles E. Merrill, Columbus, Ohio.

Tschebotarioff, G.P. (1973), “Foundations, Retaining, and Earth Structures, 2nd edition”, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Yoshida, Y., Ikemi, M. and Kokusho, T. (1988), “Empirical Formulas of SPT Blow Counts for Gravelly Soils”, Ist ISOPT, vol. 1: pp 381-387.

Van Wieringen, J.B.M. (1982), “Relating Cone Resistance and Pressuremeter Test Results,” Proc. 2nd Eur. Symp. Penetration Testing, Amsterdam, pp. 951-955.

Muramachi, T. (1974), “Experimental Study on Application of Static Cone Penetrometer to Subsurface Investigation of Weak Cohesive Soils”, Proc. European Conf. On Penetration Testing, Stockholm, 2:2, pp 285-291.

Amar, S., and Jéséquel, J.F. (1972), “Essais en place et en laboratoire sur sols cohérent comparaison des résultats”, Bull.de Liaison de LCPC, Paris, No. 58, pp97-108.






Copyright (c) 2016 Z. Rehman

Powered By KICS