Metallurgical Analysis of High Pressure Gas Pipelines Rupture


  • F. Hasan
  • F. Ahmed


On 6 July 2004, two parallel-running gas pipelines (18-inch and 24-inch diameters), in the main transmission network of SNGPL (a gas company in Pakistan) were ruptured. The ruptures occurred in the early hours of the morning about 8 miles downstream of the compressor station AC-4. The ruptures were indicated by the increased gas flow at the outlet of AC-4 [1], first at about 0648 hours and then again about 20 minutes later. The gas escaping from the ruptured lines had caught fire, and the flames had also ‘affected’ a third parallel-running pipeline of 30-inch diameter, lying next to the 24-inch line. The metallurgical examination of the two ruptured lines showed that the 24-inch line was ruptured with the help of an explosive device that had been placed on the underside of the pipe. An examination of the 18-inch line showed that this pipe had failed as a result of the heating of the pipe-wall, presumably, by the flame emanating from the 24-inch line. These two observations clearly suggested that the 24-inch line was the first to rupture (by explosives), and the fire following this rupture had heated the 18-inch pipe to a temperature where its yield strength was unable to support the inside gas pressure. The 20 minutes time interval between the two ruptures was obviously the time taken by the 18-inch pipe to be heated upto the level where it started to yield. The 30-inch line lying next to the 24-inch line was affected to the extent that its coating had been burnt-off over a length of about 40-50 feet. However, the pipe did not exhibit any signs of deshaping or deformation what-so-ever. A replica metallographic examination indicated that the microstructure of the pipe was not measurably affected by the heat. It was thus decided not to replace the ‘affected’ part of the 30-inch pipe, but only to re-coat this affected portion.


F. X. R Van Leeuwen; Food and Chemical Toxicology, 38(2000)51-58.

G. Holgate; Environmental and Waste Management, 3(2000)105-112.

G. H. Huang and J. Xia; Journal of Environmental Management, 61(2001)1-23.

Pakistan Millennium Development Goals Report, 2006., Government of Pakistan. Planning Commission., (2006)75. p. (December 23, 2008)

Global Water Partnership, Draft South Asia - Water Vision 2025, Country Report – Pakistan, (2000).

M. A. Kahlown, M. A. Tahir, H. Rasheed and K. P. Bhatti; Water Quality Status, National Water Quality Monitoring Programme, Fourth Technical Report. Pakistan Council of Research in water Resources, (2006)5.

J. A. Aziz; Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 11(2005)1087-1098.

G. Bridges; Asian Water Development Outlook 2007. Country Paper Pakistan, Asian Development Bank,(2007)9. r08.pdf (December 29, 2008)

Water and Sanitation Program. Managing Karachi's water supply and sanitation services: lessons from a workshop, (2005) 3. r/WDSP/IB/2005/11/28/000160016_20051128162902/ Rendered/PDF/344430PK0Karachi0water0supply.pdf

Guidelines for drinking-water quality; 3rd edition, volume 1. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, (2004)143-220.

Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 2nd edition, volume 2. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, (1996)991.

Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (1998), APHA, AWWA, WEF, Washington D.C.






Polymer Engineering and Chemical Engineering, Materials Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics