Methodology for Geomorphic Assessment of Alluvial Channels in Oil Sands Region - A Case Study

Muhammad Ashiq, Saqib Ehsan

Abstract


This paper explains procedure devised and used for the design of dynamic system for geomorphic studies in the Oil Sand Regions (northern Alberta, Canada), comprising Muskeg, and deals with geomorphic investigation, scientific issues and technical complexities, approach and methodology. Conventional approaches for design of reclamation drainage systems often provide rigid, non- erodible drainage facilities that are designed to handle specific extreme flood events. The alternative to rigid systems designed for specific extreme events is a dynamic system capable of accommodating evolutionary changes without accelerated erosion or unacceptable environmental impacts, a geomorphic approach. Development of this approach requires a comprehensive field investigation, afterward analysis and development of design equations for the design of streams to restore them back into preexcavation form - this study provides a systematic procedure to the solution.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ashiq, M. and Femi, A. (2006). Stream-flow measurements in Oil Sand Region of Northeastern Alberta, Annual General Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering (CSEC), Calgary Alberta, Canada.

Ade, F., Brabant, R.V., Ashiq, M., Sawatsky, L. and Katopodis, C.; (2007). Development of Alluvial Channel Regime Equations for Mine Closer Drainage Design in the Oil Sands Region of Alberta, Proceedings of 18th Canadian Hydrotechnical Conference, Challenges for Water Resources Engineering in a Changing World, Winnipeg, Canada.

Blench, T.; (1970). Regime theory design of canals with sand beds, Journal of Irrigation and drainage, ASCE,. USA, 96(2), 205-213.

Church, M. and Rood, R.; (1983). Catalogue of Alluvial River Channel Regime Data, A Report, Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Gill, M. A.; (1968). Rationalization of Lacey’s regime equations Journal of Hydraulic Division, ASCE, USA, 94(4), 983-995

Ikeda, S. and Izumi, N.; (1991). Stable channel cross sections of straight sand rivers, Water Resources Research, USA, 27(9), 2429-2438.

Montgomery, D.R. and Buffington, J.; (1993). Channel classification, Prediction of channel response and Assessment of channel condition, Report FW-SH10-93-002, SHAMW committee of Washington state timber-fish-wildlife Agreement.

Newbury, R.; (2005|). Lecture delivered to the consulting companies, Calgary, Alberta , Canada.

Newbury, R.; Design Manual: Stream Restoration Hydraulics (2010), Canadian Rivers Institute, Okanagan Centre, BC, Canada, p.233.

Rosgen, D.L.; (1994). A classification of natural rivers, Catena, Elsevier Science B.V., 22, 169- 199.

Rosgen, D.L.; (1996). Applied River Morphology, ISBN: 0-9653289-0-2.

WordiQ.com, http://www.wordiq.com/definition/ Muskeg.

Wikipedia, http://www.fact-index.com/m/mu/ muskeg.html.






Copyright (c) 2016 Muhammad Ashiq, Saqib Ehsan

Powered By KICS