Cost Comparison of Inverted Tee Girder with I-Girder: A Case Study of Shalimar Flyover

Asif Hameed, Umer Farooq, Asad-ullah Qazi, Burhan Sharif

Abstract


A study is conducted to compare cost, construction time frame and safety of the inverted-T Girder design concept used in the design of Shalimar Flyover with conventional I-girder. First, the superstructures with NHA (National Highway Authority) ‘Type H’ I-girder at five different centre to centre spacing are designed and the one at 2.75m is found to be the most economical for the span used at Shalimar Flyover. Secondly the economical I-girder superstructure is compared with the InvertedT girder superstructure used at Shalimar Flyover at 1m centre to centre spacing and it is observed that the inverted-T girder at 1m c/c spacing is 22.64 % more expensive than the I-girder super structure at 2.75m c/c spacing. However, the Inverted-T girder super structure is lesser in depth and requires lesser number of spans for the same reach than the I-girders. This reduces land acquisition cost which in turn affects the total cost of the project. The Inverted-T girders are also checked at different spacing and it is found that the same girder section at 1.3m centre to centre spacing is 9.06 % economical than the adopted 1m c/c spacing of the girders at Shalimar Flyover.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Comments by Scott, E.O. Ahmet S.O. (1997), “Alternatives to the Current AASHTO Standard Bridge Sections.” PCI Journal.

Ambare S. and Peterman R.J. (2006) Evaluation of the Inverted Tee Shallow Bridge System for Use in Kansas. Report No. K-TRAN: KSU-00- 1.

Tadros, M. K., and Kamel, M. R., (1996) “The Inverted Tee Shallow Bridge System for Rural Areas” PCI Journal, Vol.41, No.5.

WPCPHB (1967), (West Pakistan Code of Practice for Highway Bridges) Highway Department Government of West Pakistan.

AASHTO Standard Specification (1996), (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials)“Guide Specification for Design and Construction of Concrete Bridges.”

Iqbal M. (2006). Designing of Bridges on National Highways, National Highway Authority (NHA) Pakistan.

Farooq U.M., (2010) Study of Alternate Design Options for Shalimar Flyover. M.Sc. thesis Department of Civil Engineering, UET, Lahore.

Shabir M. (2009), Composite Schedule of Rates for Punjab National Highway Authority (NHA) Pakistan.

ACI Committee 215, (1974), “Consideration for Design of Concrete Structures Subjected to Fatigue Loading.” ACI Journal 71.

ACI Committee 343, (1977), “Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Structure.” ACI Journal.

Guyon, Y. (1995), “ Prestressed Concrete, John Wiley and Sons Inc.” New York.

Joseffa, V.M. Micheal, R.C. Julio, A.R. and Robert, H.L. (1997), “Alternatives to the Current AASHTO Standard Bridge Sections.” PCI Journal.

Lounis, Z. and Cohn, M. (1993), “ Optimization of Precast Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girder Sytem.” PCI Journal.

B.H.Manton. and C.B. Wilson ,(1967), (Ministry of Transportation Cement and Concrete Association) “Mot/C&CA Standard Bridge Beams.”






Copyright (c) 2016 Asif Hameed

Powered By KICS