Performance Evaluation of Anaerobic-Aerobic Treatment for the Wastewater of Potato Processing Industry: A Case Study of a Local Chips Factory


  • Sajjad Haydar
  • Ghulam Hussain
  • Obaidullah Nadeem
  • Husnain Haider
  • A.J. Bari
  • Abdul Hayee


A study was conducted to assess the performance of anaerobic-aerobic treatment system of a local potato processing industry. The wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) consisted of primary treatment, upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB), activated sludge process (ASP) and secondary clarifier. The study analyzed the physical, chemical and biochemical parameters of the influent (raw sewage) as well as the effluent from each component of the plant. Grab wastewater samples were collected on weekly basis and analyzed for the pH, settleable solids (SS), total suspended solids (TSS), total dissolved solids (TDS), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and chemical oxygen demand (COD). Study revealed that mean influent wastewater concentrations of TSS, TDS, SS, BOD and COD were 840 mg/L, 2,396 mg/L and 18.7 mL/L, 2,186 mg/L and 3,679 mg/L, respectively. The mean percentage removal efficiency in UASB for TSS, BOD and COD was found to be 56%, 61 % and 51%, respectively. The mean percentage removal efficiency in activated sludge system for TSS, BOD and COD was found to be 70%, 57% and 48%, respectively. The mean percentage removal efficiency of combined anaerobic-aerobic system for TSS, BOD and COD was found to be 93%, 90% and 80%, respectively. The mean effluent concentrations of TSS, BOD and COD were 52 mg/L, 197 mg/L and 784 mg/L, respectively. The effluent from WWTP satisfied NEQS for TSS (200 mg/L) while NEQS for BOD (80 mg/L) and COD (150 mg/L) were not satisfied. Some operational problems, responsible for inadequate efficiencies of the plant components, were identified and solutions were suggested for these problems


Berisa M, Lesis V and Didziokas, R, Comparison of pipe internal pressure calculation methods based.MECHANIKA, 4(54): 5-12, 2005.

Energy. (2012). Retrieved March 20, 2012;

Ragsdale.Engineering and Design; New Mexico Water System O & M. Pump and Motors, Santa Fe,New Mexico 2001.

HI (2013). Variable speed pumping, a guide to successful applications, www.pumps.orgaccessed 23, December, 2013.

P harris T. C. and Kolpa R. L. Overview of the Design, construction and operation of interstate liquid petroleum pipelines. US department of energy, Oak Ridge, US, December, 2000.

Brennan J. R. Rotary pumps on pipeline services. Tutorial presented at the Pumps Users Expo 200, Louisville, KY, September 2000.

Global Spec. 18” Non-Clog Pump, Griffin Pump and Equipment Inc., high_capacity_water_pumps accessed 23, July, 2014.

Parker D. B.,Positive Displacement PumpPerformance and Applications. Proceedings of 11th International Pump Users, Texas, 1994.

Streeter V.,Fluid Mechnics. 3rd Edition, US: McGraw-Hill, 1962.

Henriquez J L and Aguirre L A.,Piping Design: The Fundamentals. Presented at “Short course on geothermal drilling, resources development and power plants” organized by UNU-GTP and LaGeo, Sanata Telca, El Salvador, 2011.

White F. M., Fluid Mechnics. 4th Edition, US: McGraw-Hill, 1998.

Agrawal S K; Fluid Mechanics and Machinery, Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, India,2006.

Engineer Manaul.Engineering and Design; Liquid Process Piping. US: US Army Corps of Engineers,Washington DC, 1999.

KLM, Piping fluid material selection and line sizing (Engineering Design Guidline). Retrieved from, 2010.

Clamond D., Efficient Resolution of the Colebrook Equation. American Chemical Society, 48: 3665-3672, 2009.

Yunus A. C. and Robert H. T.,Fundamentals of thermal fluid science. McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2005.






City and Regional Planning, Environmental Engineering, Architecture