Public Consultation and Participation in EIA in Pakistan and Lessons Learnt from International Practices

Authors

  • Obaidullah Nadeem
  • Rizwan Hameed
  • Sajjad Haydar

Abstract

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of development projects is considered incomplete without involvement of potentially affected and interested public. Primarily, public participation in decision making is a concept imported from western democracies. It is heartening to note that public consultation and participation are taking place in EIA in Pakistan and many developing countries, despite undergoing prolonged dictatorship and political instability. The techniques and practices of public participation in EIA in selected developed and developing countries as well as in Pakistan have been critically reviewed to have a comparative idea. Analysis of the Pakistani practice is based on participation in public hearings, EIA workshops and interviews with concerned officials and EIA experts. Public participation in EIA in developed countries is moderately effective, transparent, initiated at initial stages of EIA process and reviewed by independent experts. On the other hand, delayed public involvement and lack of transparency in the EIA decision making process are major impediments to its effectiveness in the developing countries including Pakistan. Recommendations have been formulated to enhance its effectiveness in Pakistan on the basis of lessons learnt from other countries.

References

Wolf, A.T., Kramer, A. and Alexander, C. (2005). Managing Water Conflict and Cooperation. In state of the World 2005: The World Watch Institute. Washington D.C. 83.

Wolf, A.T; Water Policy, 1 (1998) 251-265.

Jayakumar, R., Xiaoli, D.,Kim, E. and Ke, L; Journal of Geographical Sciences, 19 (2009) 259-272.

Haider, H. and Ali, W; Pakistan Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 7 (2010) 12- 23.

Yildirim, N. C., Benzer, F. and Danabas, B; Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 21(2011) 66-71.

Yan, F., and Daming, H. E; Journal of Geographical Sciences, 19(2009)189-199.

Xiujuan, L., and Daming, H. E; Journal of Geographical Sciences, 11(2001).

Shakir, A. S., Rehman, H. and Ehsan, K; Pakistan Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 7(2010) 12-23.

APHA (American Public Health Association). (1998). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Edition, American Public Health Association. Washington, DC 2005-2605.

Ntengwe, F.W; Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 31 (2005) 832-839.

NSWCC (National Surface Water Classification Criteria) Irrigation water quality guidelines for Pakistan. (2007). Proposed by WWF-Pakistan through consultation with stakeholders

Iqbal, M., Saleem, I., Ali, Z., Khan, M. A. and Akhtar, M; Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 21 (2011) 817-821.

Viessman,W. and Hammer, M.J. (1985). Water Supply and Pollution Control, 4th Ed., Harper and Row, Newyork.

Rasheed, F., and Majeed, M; M.Sc. Thesis, Postgraduate Centre for Earth Sciences, University of Punjab, Lahore, (2002).

Khan, M., Khan, H. N. and Aslam, H; Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 6(2) (2003) 167- 175.

Afzal, S., Ahmad, I., Younas, M., Zahid, M. D., Khan, H. M., Ijaz, A. and Ali, K.; Environment International, 26 (2000) 87-96.

Yasar, A., Ahmad, N. and Khan, A. A.A.A; Science and Engineering, 29 (2008) 485–492.

Mitsch, W. J and Gosselink, J. G. (2000). Wetlands, 3rd ed., New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

Halverson, N. V. (2004). Review of constructed subsurface flow vs. surface flow wetlands, Westinghouse Savannah River Company.

Gersberg, R.M., Elkins, B.V. and Goldman, C. R; Water Research, 17 (1983) 1009–14.

Kadlec, R.H; Wetlands Ecological Management, 7 (1999) 165–75. [22] Jing, S.R. and Lin Y .F; Environmental Pollution, 127 (2004) 291–301.

Hunt, P. G., Stone, K. C., Humenik, F. J., Matheny, T. A. and Johnson, M. H; Journal of Environmental Quality, 28 (1999) 49–56.

Seung, J. K., Seok, W. H., Yong, S. C., Woo, K. B. and Sang, H. L; Process Biochemistry, 42 (2007) 199–209. [24] James, M. H. and Miriam L. D; Environmental Management, 21 (1997) 329–341

Downloads

Published

2016-06-22

Issue

Section

City and Regional Planning, Environmental Engineering, Architecture